The Fight Against Extreme and Ultra Poverty

The Fight Against Extreme and Ultra Poverty
Breaking the Cycle of Deprivation, Restoring Human Dignity

Make a Donation

or

$20
$40
$60
$100
$250
$500

$10
$2,000

Poverty Is More Than a Lack of Money

Poverty is generally defined as the condition of lacking sufficient financial resources to meet basic needs such as food, shelter, clothing, healthcare, and education. More specifically, it refers to a situation where household income falls below the minimum level required to maintain an acceptable standard of living—for example, the international poverty line set by the World Bank at $2.15 per day as of 2022.

However, poverty is often misunderstood, and these misconceptions can hinder meaningful solutions. A common myth is that poverty is caused by laziness or a lack of effort. Another misconception is that poverty is solely about money, when in reality, it is a multidimensional issue involving social exclusion, and a lack of opportunity. It's also incorrect to assume that poverty is confined to low-income countries—it exists everywhere, including in the wealthiest nations. Many believe that simply working harder or obtaining an education is enough to escape poverty, ignoring the systemic barriers that many face. Moreover, there are multiple types of poverty—such as absolute, relative, rural, and urban poverty—each shaped by different circumstances and requiring tailored approaches. Most importantly, poverty is not a permanent condition. No one is destined to remain poor; with the right support, resources, and opportunities, individuals and communities can break the cycle and build better futures.

The Fight Against Extreme Poverty: From Hope to Hurdles

For decades, the global extreme poverty rate—defined as the share of people living on less than $1.90 per day—declined dramatically, dropping from 36% in 1990 to just 10% by 2015. This remarkable progress sparked global optimism that extreme poverty could be eliminated altogether. The World Bank set an ambitious benchmark for 'eradication' at reducing the rate to below 3%, and for a time, that goal seemed within reach. However, recent trends have cast doubt on achieving this milestone by 2030. The World Bank’s 2018 Poverty and Shared Prosperity report issued a sobering reminder: to meet the 3% target, the world’s poorest nations would need to grow at rates well beyond their historical norms. Compounding the challenge, projections now suggest that climate change and forced displacement could push an additional 100 million people into extreme poverty by 2030. Even if just 4% of the global population remains below the poverty line by then, that would still represent around 340 million people—more than the entire population of the United States—underscoring that the fight against poverty remains far from over.

The Fight To Restore Human Dignity

Ultra-poverty is a severe form of extreme poverty marked by such deep material deprivation and psychological despair that conventional development aid and market-based solutions often fail to reach or impact those affected. It represents a true poverty trap—a self-perpetuating condition where lack of resources, opportunities, and hope reinforce each other, making escape extremely difficult.

Poverty is an Ultimate form of Deprivation

Economist Amartya Sen provides a helpful lens for understanding ultra-poverty by defining poverty not just as low income, but as a deprivation of basic capabilities—the freedom to make choices and live a life one has reason to value. From this perspective, the ultra-poor are not just financially poor; they are also stripped of the fundamental freedoms and privileges most people take for granted.

Trapped by Scarcity: The Cognitive Cost of Poverty

In our experience, ultra-poverty is not merely about a lack of money—it's about the complete absence of autonomy, security, and hope. Those living in ultra-poverty are often trapped in a cycle of hopelessness, sustained not just by external hardship, but by the internalized belief that a better life is out of reach. This mental and emotional trap is reinforced by cognitive overload—the overwhelming stress of facing life-or-death decisions with extremely limited resources.

For example, an ultra-poor parent may have to choose between walking miles to get their child a critical immunization or working that day to afford food. These aren't just difficult decisions—they're devastating trade-offs, often referred to as Sophie’s choices. The burden of constantly navigating such dilemmas under pressure leads to what researchers call the bandwidth tax—a phenomenon where the stress and scarcity of poverty consume so much mental energy that it impairs decision-making, focus, and long-term planning. This depletion of cognitive resources only deepens the cycle of poverty, making it even harder to break free.

Ultra Poverty Estimates

Estimates of how many people live in ultra-poverty vary, due to limited data and evolving definitions, but the number is believed to remain in the hundreds of millions. A 2007 report from the International Food Policy Research Institute, using 2004 data, estimated that 162 million people lived in ultra-poverty—defined at the time as surviving on less than 50 cents per day in 1993 purchasing power parity (PPP) terms—with another 323 million classified as living in “medial poverty,” between 50 and 75 cents per day. More recent figures from 2017 indicate that 736 million people globally were living in extreme poverty (under $1.90 per day in 2011 PPP), and of these, more than half—around 394 million—were living in ultra-poverty, facing the most severe and entrenched forms of deprivation.


The Cycle of Deprivation

Poverty is a vicious cycle of deprivation that goes far beyond a simple lack of income. It often begins with insufficient income, making it impossible for families to meet even their most basic needs—such as food, clean water, shelter, and healthcare. This leads to hunger and malnutrition, especially among children, along with poor sanitation and hygiene, which contribute to chronic health problems. When individuals are sick or undernourished, they are unable to work productively or learn effectively, leading to further loss of income and opportunity. Children in these conditions often miss school, not by choice, but because they are needed at home, are too ill, or simply cannot afford supplies or transportation. As families fall further behind, they may turn to debt just to survive, entering a cycle with no capacity for saving or investing in the future.

Over time, this persistent struggle erodes self-worth and dignity, reinforcing a sense of hopelessness. The cycle doesn’t end with one generation—children born into poverty are often trapped in the same conditions, with few chances to break free. This complex, self-perpetuating system is compounded by the cognitive tax—the overwhelming mental burden of daily survival decisions that leaves little room for long-term thinking or change. Breaking this cycle requires more than temporary relief; it demands sustained, holistic interventions that address both material deprivation and the mental toll of living in constant scarcity.

Cycle
of
Poverty
Household with Insufficient Income
Basic Needs Not Covered
Poor Sanitation
Health Problems
Not Able to Work or Learn
Children Missing School
Debt Cycle, No Savings
Children Trapped in Poverty
Hunger & Malnutrition
Loss of Dignity

The Different Types of Poverty

Poverty is not a monolithic condition—it affects people in diverse and complex ways. Poverty can look very different depending on where and how people live, and it's not uncommon for individuals to experience multiple, overlapping forms of poverty at once. Understanding the different types of poverty helps us recognize the specific challenges families face and design more effective, anti-poverty solutions.

1

Absolute Poverty

  • Definition: A condition where individuals lack the basic necessities of life—such as food, clean water, shelter, and healthcare.
  • Measured by: The international poverty line (e.g., living on less than $2.15 per day, according to the World Bank).
2

Relative Poverty

  • Definition: Poverty defined in relation to the standards of living in a given society. People may have basic needs met but cannot afford the minimum acceptable standard of living in their community.
  • Measured by: Income compared to national or community averages (e.g., earning less than 50% of the median household income).
3

Situational Poverty

  • Definition: A temporary state of poverty caused by a sudden crisis or loss—such as a job loss, natural disaster, conflict, or health emergency.
  • Key Trait: Often short-term and recoverable with proper support.
4

Chronic (Persistent) Poverty

  • Definition: Long-term poverty that spans many years or generations. Individuals face persistent deprivation with little to no opportunity to escape.
  • Key Trait: Structural barriers, intergenerational poverty.
5

Urban Poverty

  • Definition: Poverty experienced by individuals in cities or densely populated areas, often marked by overcrowding, unsafe housing, high living costs, and limited access to public services.
  • Key Trait: May be invisible or hidden.
6

Rural Poverty

  • Definition: Poverty in less populated, rural areas, often marked by limited infrastructure, poor access to education and healthcare, and fewer economic opportunities.
  • Key Trait: Isolation with lack of transportation and basic infrastructure.
7

Generational Poverty

  • Definition: Poverty that is passed down from one generation to the next. Often linked to a lack of education, social mobility, and intergenerational trauma.
  • Key Trait: Deeply rooted in family and community structures.
8

Working Poverty (In-Work Poverty)

  • Definition: When individuals have jobs but still live in poverty due to low wages.
  • Key Trait: Often affecting day labor.
9

Hidden or Invisible Poverty

  • Definition: Poverty that is not immediately obvious, such as families who appear to be managing but are burdened by debt, food insecurity, or lack of savings.
  • Key Trait: Often affecting elderly individuals living alone.
10

Ultra Poverty

  • Definition: The most severe form of poverty, where individuals survive on extremely low incomes (often under $1/day) and face chronic hunger, illness, and exclusion.
  • Key Trait: Isolated families with lack of assets.


The Moral Imperative to End Poverty: Faith and the Science of Hope

The fight against poverty is not only a matter of policy or charity—it is a profound moral imperative. In the Gospel of Matthew 25, Jesus calls his followers to care for "the least of these," reminding us that feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, and welcoming the stranger are acts of sacred responsibility. While rooted in spiritual tradition, this call transcends religious boundaries. It speaks to a universal ethic of human dignity, compassion, and justice. In contrast to the fatalistic notion that poverty is inevitable or somehow natural, both faith-based and secular perspectives affirm that poverty is man-made and solvable. It is not a fixed condition, but a challenge shaped by systems, choices, and neglect—and therefore, one that can be changed. The work of fighting poverty is, at its core, the science of hope: a deliberate, evidence-based effort to unlock human potential, restore opportunity, and build a future where no one is left behind. To accept poverty as unchangeable is to reject both our shared humanity and the power of collective action.



Multidimensional Poverty Traps and Empirical Studies

The concepts of the poverty cycle and poverty traps first emerged in academic literature in the 1950s, with Gunnar Myrdal (1957) introducing the idea of "circular and cumulative causation," which explains how poverty perpetuates itself. However, it is only in the past two decades that empirical research on multidimensional poverty traps has expanded significantly. Researchers now utilize household data, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and econometric models to examine how interconnected deprivations—such as education, health, income, and social capital—contribute to persistent poverty.

Breaking
the Poverty Trap

Summary

Jeffrey D. Sachs contends that extreme poverty is often a self-perpetuating cycle driven by structural challenges, rather than merely individual shortcomings or poor governance. Many impoverished nations struggle with low productivity, weak institutions, inadequate healthcare, and insufficient investment, preventing them from accumulating the savings or economic momentum necessary for growth. Moreover, Sachs underscores the impact of geographic and environmental obstacles, such as harsh climates, poor infrastructure, and resource scarcity, which further hinder economic progress. To break this cycle, he advocates for external support, including foreign aid, infrastructure development, and strategic interventions in health, education, and agriculture, which are crucial for enabling sustainable development and long-term economic stability.

Authors

Jeffrey D. Sachs

Publisher

Columbia Earth Institute

Source

Scientific American, 2007

Takeaway

Here are the key points summarizing the article:
  • The most impoverished regions of the world, primarily in Africa, Central Asia, and the Andes, are trapped in poverty due to geographic factors such as low food productivity, heavy disease burden, and physical isolation.
  • The primary causes of poverty traps include dependence on irregular rainfall, weak soils, mountainous terrain, tropical diseases, and lack of access to sea-based trade routes.
  • Breaking these poverty traps requires targeted investments in raising food security, improving agricultural productivity, controlling diseases, and developing infrastructure to reduce economic isolation.
  • The Earth Institute at Columbia University, in partnership with the UN and Millennium Promise, is implementing targeted investment projects in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, showing promising early results in alleviating poverty and improving living conditions.
Download PDF

Effect of a Nutrition Intervention During Early Childhood on Economic Productivity in Guatemalan Adults

Summary

There is substantial but indirect evidence suggesting that early childhood nutrition improvements in developing countries serve as long-term economic investments. To directly assess this impact, we examined the effects of an early childhood nutrition intervention on adult economic productivity.

This study analyzed economic data from 1,424 Guatemalan individuals (aged 25–42 years) between 2002 and 2004, representing 60% of the original 2,392 children (aged 0–7 years) who participated in a nutrition intervention study from 1969 to 1977.

The study found that improving nutrition in early childhood led to substantial increases in wage rates.

Authors

John Hoddinott, John A Maluccio, Jere R Behrman, Rafael Flores, Reynaldo Martorell

Publishers

International Food Policy Research Institute, Department of Economics, Middlebury College, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University

Source

Lancet 2008

Takeaway

Here are the key points summarizing the article:
  • Exposure to a nutritious supplement had a significant, positive effect on wage rates for men but not for women.
  • The authors measured a 46% increase in average wages for men
  • While women are equally impacted by under-nutrition and developmental delays, other factors need to be addressed to increase their earning potential.
  • Early intervention between age 0 and 2 is key to maximizing earning potential
Download PDF

Breaking out of the
Poverty Trap

Summary

Lindsay Coates and Scott MacMillan explore the persistent issue of ultra-poverty and propose comprehensive strategies to address it. They emphasize the importance of understanding the unique challenges faced by the ultra-poor, who often remain invisible to policymakers and society.

This article highlights the effectiveness of the "graduation approach," a sequenced set of interventions designed to provide the ultra-poor with the necessary tools, resources, and hope to achieve sustainable livelihoods. By combining material support with psychological empowerment, this approach has shown promise in breaking the cycle of poverty and enabling individuals to attain economic independence.

The authors advocate for scalable, evidence-based solutions that not only address the material needs of the ultra-poor but also foster a sense of self-worth and optimism, which are crucial for long-term success.

Authors

Lindsay Coates and Scott MacMillan

Publisher

Brookings Institution

Source

Brookings Institution, 2019

Takeaway

  • Ultra-poverty is a severe form of extreme poverty characterized by material destitution and psychological despair, affecting an estimated 394 million people globally. It creates a self-reinforcing poverty trap that is resistant to most conventional development interventions.
  • Rigorous studies, including randomized controlled trials across multiple countries, have shown the graduation approach to be effective in sustainably improving the economic and psychological well-being of ultra-poor households, with benefits persisting years after the program ends.
  • Ultra- poverty is qualitatively different from other forms of poverty. Part of the reason is nonmaterial factors such as stress, hopelessness, and the constant present- day cognitive load of making ends meet. Poverty is, at heart, a deprivation of one’s capacity to be fully human
Download PDF

Escaping the Poverty Trap: Investing in Children in Latin America

Summary

The author emphasizes that the period from conception through preschool is when children are most vulnerable to long-term developmental challenges, but also when interventions can be most effective. It proposes early childhood investment policies as a means to break this cycle, highlighting insufficient education as a primary factor perpetuating poverty across generations.

Contributors, including Nobel Laureate Amartya Sen and former WHO Director-General Gro Harlem Brundtland, discuss strategies such as quality childcare and comprehensive services that not only foster a nurturing environment for children but also enable parents to improve their economic standing.

This book outlines principles for designing early childhood programs, emphasizing the empowerment of parents, addressing children's developmental needs, adapting to local contexts, preventive intervention, financial sustainability, and focusing resources on households where children are most at risk.

Authors

Ricardo Morán.

Publisher

nter-American Development Bank in 2003

Source

Johns Hopkins University

Takeaway

  • Investing in children from conception through preschool has the highest returns in reducing long-term poverty.
  • Programs that focus on nutrition, cognitive stimulation, and early education significantly improve future earnings, health, and productivity.
  • Poor education is a primary driver of persistent poverty in Latin America.
  • Empowering parents enhances child development. Policies that provide job opportunities, parental education, and childcare support help create a better environment for child development.
  • Investing in early health and education is cheaper and more effective than addressing poverty in adulthood.
Download PDF

Poverty and Shared Prosperity Report 2018: Piecing Together the poverty Puzzle

Summary

This reports presents a more nuanced understanding of global poverty, emphasizing that it is far more complex than income alone. While the report acknowledges progress in reducing extreme poverty—defined as living on less than $1.90 a day—it warns that this progress is slowing, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa. To capture a fuller picture, the World Bank introduces higher poverty thresholds ($3.20 and $5.50 per day) and highlights non-monetary dimensions such as access to education, healthcare, and basic infrastructure. The report argues that effective poverty reduction requires going beyond economic metrics to consider the lived experiences of the poor, using better data and tailored policies. Ultimately, it calls for a people-centered approach that addresses the multiple, overlapping factors that keep individuals and communities trapped in poverty.

Authors

Poverty and Shared Prosperity 2018

Publisher

2018 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank

Source

www.worldbank.org/

Takeaway

  • Global progress in reducing extreme poverty has slowed, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa.
  • The report introduces complementary poverty lines at $3.20 and $5.50 per day to reflect the realities of middle-income countries.
  • It emphasizes non-monetary dimensions of poverty, such as lack of education, health risks, and poor infrastructure, which are essential to fully understand people’s lived experiences.
  • iThe reports calls for policies that are people-centered, context-specific, and designed to address the many interconnected factors that trap people in poverty.
Download PDF

International Food Policy Research Institute Annual Report 2007-2008

Summary

The International Food Policy Research Institute Annual Report 2007–2008 focuses on the global food crisis of 2007–2008, characterized by sharp increases in food prices that significantly impacted food security worldwide.

The report analyzes the causes of the crisis, including rising demand, biofuel production, and market volatility, and emphasizes the disproportionate effects on the poor, who spend a large portion of their income on food.

It advocates for increased investment in agriculture, improved market regulation, and expanded social protection programs to address both immediate needs and long-term food security.


Authors

International Food Policy Research Institute

Publisher

International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). 2008. IFPRI Annual Report 2007-2008.

Source

IFPRI Annual Reports

Takeaway

  • The 2007–2008 surge in global food prices had devastating effects, especially on the world’s poorest populations.
  • Food insecurity worsened, pushing millions into hunger and malnutrition.
  • Low-income populations, who spend a large portion of their income on food, were disproportionately affected.
  • The report urged governments and donors to reverse the decline in agricultural funding.
  • Emphasis was placed on smallholder farmers, especially in developing countries, as key to global food security.
Download PDF